Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in posts

Brand Revamping and Packaging Redesign

Brand Revamping and Packaging Redesign

Known for its range of flavors, Klast gum has been a firm favorite for Saudi families since the 2000s. The supermarket flavored gum category is a confusing mix of pack formats and brands with a mass of product messaging. The aisle was also often overlooked from a brand maintenance point of view and had also attained a reputation of products high in sugar and lacking any long-lasting flavor.

I saw the opportunity of revitalizing the category by rethinking the product formulation, fortifying the products with sugar-free bursting flavors, and a new packaging format. In doing so the brand would raise the bar for the category and improve the shelf impact which needed to be refreshingly bold, fun and aspirational.

I recreated the brand into a simple and proud brand mark which stretched across the entirely new 5 packs shouting out of a new brighter color palette. A new cartoon-stylized illustration set of flavor callouts was created which added the fun factor back into the packaging. A flavor matched colored background helped tell the Klast Gum story. These new elements put the serious fun and enjoyment back into the brand and seriously shakes up the category with a new personality.

CREDIT

  • Agency/Creative: Andrew Hesham
  • Article Title: Brand Revamping and Packaging Redesign
  • Organisation/Entity: Freelance, Published Commercial Design
  • Project Type: Packaging
  • Agency/Creative Country: Egypt
  • Market Region: Middle East
  • Project Deliverables: Brand Experience, Brand Guidelines, Brand Redesign, Brand Refinement, Packaging Design, Product Architecture, Rebranding, Tone of Voice
  • Format: Blister-Pack
  • Substrate: Plastic, Pulp Paper

FEEDBACK

Relevance: Solution/idea in relation to brand, product or service
Excellent
Vote
4
Good
Vote
3
Bad
Vote
4
Implementation: Attention, detailing and finishing of final solution
Excellent
Vote
5
Good
Vote
2
Bad
Vote
3
Presentation: Text, visualisation and quality of the presentation
Excellent
Vote
4
Good
Vote
3
Bad
Vote
4