• Project

  • Region

  • Industry

WhatCameNext_ Designs a Great Beer With No Bull – Grab a Frothy!

WhatCameNext_ Designs a Great Beer With No Bull – Grab a Frothy!

Everyone loves a frothy, eh? A quintessential Australian colloqualism turned into a brand from Australia’s largest brewer. We created a beer coming from Matilda Bay that’s brewed with local hops and barley for today’s consumer. The original Aussie craft brewery who have been brewing on home shores since 1984 wanted an offer that walks the line between craft and mainstream that would appeal to mass appeal.

It was critical that the offer would standout amongst the competition, and also have the ability to confidently own it’s space. Focusing on the beer and just the beer, it speaks directly to the everyday Australian with wit and simplicity.

Building on our audiences growing desire in no nonsense brands WCN_ created Frothy to deliver on the basic customer expectation, a great tasting ice cold frothy. Just great beer, with no bull.

Utilisiing raw substrates such as the naked can and box helped the brand to remain raw and real, and strangely iconic despite being free from overt tricks and finishes.

CREDIT

  • Agency/Creative: WhatCameNext_
  • Article Title: WhatCameNext_ Designs a Great Beer With No Bull – Grab a Frothy!
  • Organisation/Entity: Agency, Published Commercial Design
  • Project Type: Packaging
  • Agency/Creative Country: Australia
  • Market Region: Oceania
  • Project Deliverables: Brand Advertising, Brand Architecture, Brand Creation, Brand Experience, Brand Guidelines, Brand Identity, Brand Naming, Brand Strategy, Branding, Graphic Design, Identity System, Packaging Design, Tone of Voice
  • Format: Box, Can, Case, Keg
  • Substrate: Glass Bottle, Metal, Pulp Carton

FEEDBACK

Relevance: Solution/idea in relation to brand, product or service
Excellent
Vote
3
Good
Vote
1
Bad
Vote
0
Implementation: Attention, detailing and finishing of final solution
Excellent
Vote
3
Good
Vote
0
Bad
Vote
1
Presentation: Text, visualisation and quality of the presentation
Excellent
Vote
3
Good
Vote
0
Bad
Vote
0